Skip to the content

Ben White

  • About
  • Archives
  • Asides
  • Support
    • Paying Surveys for Doctors
  • Medical Advice
    • Book: The Texas Medical Jurisprudence Exam: A Concise Review
    • Book: Student Loans (Free!)
    • Book: Fourth Year & The Match (Free!)
  • Radiology Jobs
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • About
  • Archives
  • Asides
  • Support
    • Paying Surveys for Doctors
  • Medical Advice
    • Book: The Texas Medical Jurisprudence Exam: A Concise Review
    • Book: Student Loans (Free!)
    • Book: Fourth Year & The Match (Free!)
  • Radiology Jobs
  • Search
  • #
  • #
  • #
  • #

Book Review: Physician Finance

03.30.16 // Finance, Reviews

Next up through the Kindle Unlimited tour of “free” books written for physicians is Physician Finance: A Personal Finance Guide for Doctors by KM Awad.

This book’s style is very casual. Normally that’s fine, but I wonder if perhaps among the jokes and looseness if the message is maybe diluted (some may appreciate it more than me; I found it tiresome but it certainly keeps things light). This book covers the basics. In fact, every book covers the basics. And in practice, the basics can always be summarized in a few bullet points.

  • Spend less than you earn. If you can, spend a lot less.
  • Housing and transportation are people’s two biggest expenses. If you can, definitely spend less on these.
  • Pay off your debts as fast as you can: the higher the interest rate, the faster you need to pay it off.
  • Invest for retirement (in tax-advantaged accounts like 401(k)s, 403(b)s, 457(b)s, and Roth IRAs). The earlier you start and the more you save, the better.
  • Seriously, stop spending so much money.

But here, some of the “details” are wrong. And if not wrong, some are definitely fringe viewpoints expressed like facts.

Incorrect view of credit cards and credit card perks

Credit cards aren’t the work of the devil; they’re a (potentially dangerous) tool of convenience. No one likes the idea of being in debt (or actually being in debt), but Awad writes with an almost irrational fear of it (to the point that otherwise reasonable arguments begin to lose steam). There’s been a recent push among some authors to encourage people to use cash over plastic, as it’s been shown in some studies that people spend more per purchase with credit cards than cash. This may be true, but using cash is super inconvenient (and try booking a hotel without a credit card). Credit card perks are in fact real (and there are whole sites dedicated to this), and while it’d be silly to think that the card companies are doing this for charity, if you pay on time, it’s the merchants you buy from who are paying the fees, not you. The only people who should really be staying away from cards are the ones carrying around high-interest credit card debt month to month.

Poor understanding of car leases

Don’t get me wrong, no one is being “frugal” when they they get a car lease (or buy a new car at all), but Awad is wrong on some basic lease facts. Anyone who simply writes that leases are always worse than buying is equally wrong as someone who says renting is always worse than owning. A simple common misconception. Don’t get me wrong, ideally everyone should buy a three year old Honda in cash. But given that not every reader is going to do that, this treatment comes across as ridiculous. If you are going to go get a brand new vehicle, then you should know that whether you lease or buy, the vast majority of all that money goes to depreciation. Even if you buy, there’s minimal equity after a typical three year lease term. So whether leasing is worse than buying depends entirely on the terms of your lease versus the terms of your purchase as well as how long you plan on holding on to the car. It’s not that leasing is always worse than buying, it’s that getting a new car every few years is a costly luxury.

Poor understanding of mortgages

Treatment of mortgages is also overly simplistic and somewhat misleading. Awad is particularity wrong regarding adjustable rate mortgages, particularly with regards to loans like 5-year ARMs, where the rate is fixed for a set amount of time and then adjustable afterwards. Again, you can get in a lot of trouble if you use a nice low rate on an ARM to buy a house you can’t afford, but depending on your plans, an ARM may make perfect sense.1For example, if you were to decide to buy a reasonably priced starter home in a strong area for a 5-year surgical residency knowing you will want/need to buy a family home later, then buying a 7-year ARM may make good sense and save you money without any meaningful risk.

He also argues for a 15 year over a 30 year mortgage without any consideration of their tax consequences, for example. No one would argue that a 15 year costs less (it does) or will have a better interest rate (it will), but that doesn’t mean that depending on the interest rate difference that a 30 year isn’t a better choice, say for someone getting a super low fixed rate and who has plenty of tax-deferred retirement space left to invest the excess.

Useless discussion of student loans

The biggest, most complicated, most-“physiciany” issue facing young docs is their large student loan burden.This book does a terrible job discussing student loan debt, being both too succinct and simplistic, out of date, and also inaccurate. Awad spends time discussing subsidized loans, which you can’t get anymore for medical school. He recommends deferment, which you also can’t get anymore (forbearance is different and with worse terms). No meaningful discussion on any of the actual payment options, IBR, PAYE, REPAYE, consolidation, or private refinancing. Nothing about PSLF. This topic is one of the things that actually deserves some detail in a finance book from docs and is conspicuously absent.

Overall

One downside to Awad’s viewpoint of extreme debt fear is the potential quality of life hit. The purpose of money is to make you happy (i.e. many of us “work to live”). Sometimes trying to save a buck here and there results in a big happiness hit, especially during the medical school time period. It’s not always worth it, and it’s silly to pretend it is. It’s at least as alienating as it is inspiring.2Ironically the author promotes his super stingy living expenses during medical school as a way to save money on top of his private school tuition (as opposed to mentioning the massive and likely bigger savings from going to a public medical school)

The core message of the book is fine. The core message of the book is also the core message of every personal finance book, which could also be a blog post (which is true of every self-help book). The details though, from credit cards to loans to retirement, are just too patchy to recommend.3Another random example, he discusses the Sep IRA for the self-employed without mention of the solo 401k, which is an overall better vehicle for most people and enables you to also contribute to the “backdoor Roth IRA.”

Verdict: While this book is free for KU subscribers, anyone paying should just read The White Coat Investor, which while definitely not perfect (and particularly lacking for student loans), is a substantially better book overall.

Book Review: Pay Yourself First & Changing Outcomes

02.25.16 // Finance, Reviews

I recently started a 30-day Kindle Unlimited free trial, which gave me a chance to pick up a bunch of Kindle titles (to read on my phone).4I’ve actually always ignored the “Kindle Unlimited: Free” offers that I’ve been seeing on Amazon for a long time. But a lot of folks have been reading my book as part the program recently, so I thought I’d finally check it out. I used the opportunity to take a look at a large fraction of the (mostly self-published) books on medical school advice and physician finance.

My first review is a combo of two sibling books written by financial planners of “TGS Financial Advisors.” These folks specialize in “servicing” physicians; they’re CFPs and not MDs.

The first, Pay Yourself First, is geared toward doctors just out residency/fellowship (potential clients for their $5000/year fee-based advisor service). The second, Changing Outcomes, is directed toward mid-career physicians (who presumably could fork over even more money). This is amusingly reflected in the price, as Changing Outcomes costs a bit more.

Both books are short and share large portions verbatim. Pay Yourself First focuses on convincing you to save more and not spend too much of your new-found income. Changing Outcomes begs you to save more and stop spending so much. The actual financial advice is physician-directed though almost entirely not physician-specific.

The covers are nice, and they paid Kirkus a few hundred bucks for a blurb, so they’re taking the “book as native advertising” concept seriously. There are a few typos and whatnot, perhaps less than average for self-published. I think most recent medical school grads with their massive student loan burdens are more in tune/fearful of their financial future than older docs of the more lucrative medical past, but the discussion of why a high savings rate is the foundation of building wealth and retirement security is nicely written.

A few of my favorite passages.

Here at the beginning of your career your assets are probably smaller than those owned by the average public school teacher. Asset poor and cash flow rich; in your first years of practice, everyone will want a piece of that cash flow.

This is a hidden cost of medical training that most non-physicians simply cannot understand. Not only have you studied longer than any other professional, incurred hundreds of thousands of dollars in education loans, and deferred a serious payday until your mid-30s, you have also lost precious years of potential compounding on your savings.

When you finally start making money, you’re already way behind. You have tons of debt and haven’t saved nearly enough, and those valuable years of compounding interest are gone forever.

Unfortunately, the relationship of wealth to happiness is asymmetric. Moving up is often only temporarily rewarding. But losing ground—suffering even a limited reduction in socio-economic status—is durably painful.

Lifestyle inflation is much easier to avoid than reverse.

Spending on possessions has the most transient effect on happiness, while spending on relationships and experiences has more durable emotional benefits. Unlike status based on earning or spending, research suggests that attaining $1 million of net worth is associated with a permanent increase in confidence and self-esteem.

Having enough money to tell the hospital admin to do something profane to themselves: Priceless.

Outside of these general themes, there is almost zero detail. This is not a DIY book, so other than the inspiration, the books are pretty much useless. Hint: They think you should get a financial advisor.

Overall, the you-need-an-advisor sell isn’t particularly egregious, but it is a bit amusing as it comes after discussion of how low-cost low-fee index fund investing is the right choice (something you definitely don’t need an advisor to set up). Fee-based financial advisors are essentially life coaches who focus on your money. You really only need one if you can’t be trusted to not sabotage yourself.

Verdict: If you need convincing to save more and spend less, either one is a pretty well-written plea and is a fine free read if you have KU. Otherwise, save your money and look elsewhere, like WCI or Bogleheads’.

 

The Pros and Cons of REPAYE (and what residents should do)

02.16.16 // Finance

This post is pretty long, but this is an important development on the federal student loan front that’s worth the lengthy discussion. The bottom line is that the new REPAYE program has a lot to offer people currently not just in IBR but also PAYE. I highly recommend putting some numbers into this calculator to see how the repayment options look to you currently as well as how they might change with your career over the near future. Many residents should be doing REPAYE.

First, what is REPAYE?

REPAYE (or “revised pay as you earn”) is the newest federal government student loan payback plan, designed to give older borrowers from the (pre-PAYE) IBR regime a chance to benefit from some features of the newer PAYE plan (10% cap of your discretionary income instead of 15%) while also closing some of its “loopholes.” As a general rule, the feds don’t change current programs; they create new ones and “grandfather” people in the old ones. Rather than extending PAYE to more people (those with loans prior to October 1st, 2007 or without new loans since October 1st, 2011), they made REPAYE.

Here are the main features of the REPAYE program (contrasted with PAYE and IBR as applicable) and how it may affect switching:Read More →

Review: Refinancing with Credible for Doctors

02.02.16 // Finance

Like the ACA healthcare marketplace or Kayak, Credible isn’t actually lender itself. It’s a student loan marketplace of (currently) 9 vendors that allows you to apply to multiple companies simultaneously and compare rates (and terms, monthly payments, total payoffs, etc).

Pros:

  • Polished interface
  • Easy initial application process
  • Ability to compare rates from multiple lenders simultaneously
  • Saves time versus applying to all lenders separately

Cons:

  • Several big players are missing (enumerated here), which means you’d still have to do some separate standalone applications if you want to ensure you’re getting the absolute best rate.
  • Neither of the companies that have refinance programs tailored to residents are included, meaning that Credible isn’t a viable option for most residents yet.

Bottom line:

If you’re a busy attending who has been putting off refinancing because of the hassle, Credible is for you (yes you, I know you’re out there). Several of the big players are included and you can do the preliminary application in minutes and get a rate comparison within a day or two. Once you pick your lender, Credible sends over your application and documents and you’re turfed over to that lender to finalize the process as usual.

If you’re serious about getting the very lowest rate, Credible by itself may not be sufficient. While most lenders have similar rate ranges, you can’t predict who will provide the best, so you’d still have to apply to several of these guys not in the marketplace yourself for thorough comparison shopping. In this case, you could still use Credible to save some time by applying to several lenders together, but then giving up $100-300 referral bonuses in some cases may not be worth it to you.

If you’re still a resident or post-match MS4, Credible isn’t for you (yet). I’m told there are plans for some resident-friendly plans in the future, but the two current players in this arena aren’t part of the marketplace.

 

Life Lessons from P. T. Barnum

12.07.15 // Finance, Miscellany, Reading

You may not be familiar with P. T. Barnum, but you’d probably recognize the 19th century showman’s longstanding legacy: the Barnum & Bailey circus. In 1880, he also published the self-help/personal finance book, The Art of Money Getting; Or, Golden Rules for Making Money, which contains essentially everything you’ve ever read in a blog or book about the topic (in old timey English, for bonus points). The book is available for free on Kindle, but here are some of my favorite life lessons:Read More →

What to do with your old employer-sponsored retirement accounts

11.13.15 // Finance

After you’ve switched employers, it’s time to think about what to do with the old retirement account(s) (401k/403b/457) you previously contributed to. But before you do anything, make sure any company match dollars you’ve earned have vested appropriately. Vesting schedules (i.e. when the money is yours free and clear) vary, and vesting may occur immediately, with some fixed percentage per year employed, completion of a specified residency program or contract period, etc.

As a personal anecdote, my transitional year internship had a 50% match up to 4% of salary with 100% vesting after the completion of a residency program (our TY qualified, as it was considered a complete 1-year program). I noticed that the vested portion of my employee contribution was still zero dollars after finishing two years ago, so I eventually got around to emailing them, they looked into it, realized the error, and contacted the plan: now I have my money. Now, my former employer was very responsive, and I doubt very much that this was done on purpose, but there is no denying that it would be in a company’s best interest to conveniently forget to vest their matching contributions and see who notices. Just saying.

Anyway, once you have all your hard earned money under your name, you have three real choices: cash out the plan, keep it where it is, or transfer/rollover to a new account.

Option 1: Spend it

No. Don’t cash out the plan. You’ll pay both federal and state taxes on it like it’s regular income PLUS an additional 10% early withdrawal penalty (because you’re probably not 59.5 years old). Your tax-sheltered retirement account distributions are limited on an annual basis (i.e. you can only contribute 18k in 2015/16), so why waste the benefits and tax-free growth?

Option 2: Leave it

Leave the money where it is. Nothing wrong with this, but your former employer’s plan may not have the best fund options or the lowest fees. Some employers also won’t let you do this if your balance is low, and others may hike up your fees without giving you a solid heads up once you’re no longer part of the team. Bottom line: if your old plan doesn’t have low management fees with access to low-cost index funds, then it’s not a great place for your money.

Option 3: Move it

For many people, moving it elsewhere is the best plan.

Your new employer
You can usually transfer funds into your new employer’s fund (assuming they accept rollovers), which is a good idea if your employer’s plan is better. But if the fees or fund options aren’t better, then the main advantage to a transfer in this setting is having fewer accounts to keep track of.

Roth IRA
If your income is within the Roth limits (which it almost certainly is as a resident or fellow), you can roll over a regular 401k/403b to a Roth IRA (you’ll pay taxes on the conversion, but then it’ll be tax-free on withdrawal). This may be the best option as a resident (if you have the money on hand to pay the taxes on it) and a good in general, particularly if your current income is lower than you expect during retirement. You can also always convert a Roth 401k/403b to Roth IRA with no penalty (Roth to Roth conversions are always Kosher), so if you have a Roth 401k/403b, just do this.

Individual (Solo) 401k
If you moonlight or have any self-employment 1099 income, then you could transfer your old money into a solo 401k that you set up for your side business’ income.2If you’re setting up an account for this purpose, make sure your chosen company accepts rollovers! Individual 401ks are pretty awesome. While you can still only contribute up 18k per year as an individual, your business can also offer up 20% of its (your) profits up to the 51k limit (which is a per business limit, not a per person limit).225% if you go to the trouble of filing as an S-corp instead of a sole proprietor Vanguard, one of the best solo 401k options, doesn’t allow for 401k rollovers, but low-cost competitor Fidelity does. An individual 401k of your choosing should have lower fees and good fund options compared with most employer plans.

Traditional IRA
Lastly, you could roll it over into a traditional IRA. But putting pre-tax money into a tIRA means that if you attempt the “backdoor Roth” in the future (which you should/will), you’ll eventually have pay tax on the conversion. So probably not the best unless you then roll over the IRA into an employer’s 401k (that takes rollovers) in the future. There’s no reason to do this really unless both your old and current employer’s options have high fees and you don’t have any 1099 income at the moment to set up your own 401k.

The internet has a gazillion pages dedicated to this question. Here is some good further discussion of the options and their relative merits.

Should I start saving for retirement during residency?

11.06.15 // Finance

If your employer offers matching contributions to a tax-advantaged retirement account, then yes. You should be contributing to the match limit. That’s free money. Obviously, if you’re training in a high cost of living area and surviving on ramen you steal from a roommate you found on Craigslist, then nevermind.

From there, if you have more money, what to do next depends on the status of your loans.Read More →

Refinancing student loans during medical school

10.26.15 // Finance

[Last revised December 2020)

There are a few good options for refinancing your federal student loans and their unreasonably high interest rates into something more manageable during residency (currently: Laurel Road, SoFi, and Splash, discussed at length here).

Once you’re an attending, even more options enter the fray (enumerated at length here). Ideally though, unless you didn’t know you weren’t planning on going for PSLF, you’d have refinanced earlier in residency to maximize your savings.

But medical students have up until now been relegated to getting loans, not refinancing them. Recently, Laurel Road squeezed the competition into medical school proper: post-match fourth years can now apply for their student loan refinancing.

While you sadly can’t get a better interest rate earlier in your education, it does mean that the minute you get that match letter to prove you have a job, you can start the process. When you apply in March, Laurel Road honors the usual six-month grace period, so nothing changes in that sense compared with your federal loans. They require $100/month payments during training (residency + fellowship) after the grace period (which is much lower than the usual PAYE payment and won’t ever increase in size until attendinghood). By applying in March instead of July, you’d save around four months of capitalized interest.

A numerical illustration:
200k at 6.8% accrues around $1133/month in interest. Refinancing that to 5% would knock the monthly interest down to $833/month, thus saving you $1200 over that brief four month span. Neat.3You can run your own numbers. The more you owe and the bigger the difference in interest rate, the more you save (and vice versa.)

Also of potential interest, Laurel Road also offers a referee bonus of $300 for readers of this site if you refinance via one of the links on this page.

I’ve written at length about refinancing your student loans, but the short of it is that payments during residency are thus low to nonexistent, and you can save a lot of money even with a mild interest rate reduction over the life of your loan in terms of interest accumulation. The potential downside is that you give up the option for loan forgiveness, both PSLF and the 20/25 year forgiveness made theoretically possible by IBR/PAYE. For low to average loan burdens or short residencies, that’s not a big loss. If you want to do pediatric endocrinology and borrowed $500k, obviously that’s a bigger consideration.2Note: If you can avoid borrowing $500k, you should. That’s a ton of money!

If you were planning on forbearing your loans because you won’t have the cashflow to make steady payments, then you should almost certainly refinance regardless. Going for loan forgiveness only make sense when you’ve been making years of low monthly payments during residency. For someone forbearing, refinancing saves thousands over the course of even a short residency.

It’s worth it to sit down for a few minutes with a loan calculator and some ideas about your residency, fellowship, and early attending pay to see how much you’d pay over 10 years of income-driven repayment, 20-25 years of IBR/PAYE, or with private refinancing. For many students, refinancing is the right choice financially as well as the most financially liberating during residency (and much much better than forbearance!). Doing so as early as possible is prudent, especially while interest rates remain low. Don’t forget, if the economy were to tank again and rates drop further, you could always refinance again (all of the student loan companies currently operating offer zero cost refinancing programs without origination fees or points required).

Switching from IBR to PAYE

09.16.15 // Finance

Update 2/2016: The DOE newest repayment plan, REPAYE is now available. For many if not most residents, REPAYE is probably a better choice than PAYE. I wrote about the pros and cons of REPAYE at length in this post. While the benefits and numbers are a bit different, the process of changing plans is the same.

For eligible borrowers, PAYE is just plain better than IBR.3By IBR, I mean the IBR that applies to nearly all borrowers that are not current MS1s. IBR for new borrowers (without any loans predating July 1, 2014) is very very similar to PAYE.

  • The mandatory monthly payment is capped at 10% of discretionary income instead of 15%
  • Loans are forgiven after 20 years instead of 25 (not relevant to most practicing physicians)
  • Capitalized interest is limited to 10% of the original loan amount (that’s neat).
  • Both are qualifying payments towards the 120 needed to qualify for PSLF
  • Like IBR, the government pays interest on subsidized loans for 3 years (at this point only relevant for those with subsidized undergraduate loans, as grad subsidies are gone)
  • Loans forgiven after the 20 years are taxed as income (just like IBR). Loans forgiven as part of PSLF are not considered taxable.

The financial requirement for PAYE is the same as IBR: you must demonstrate a “partial financial hardship” (i.e. the percentage/calculated monthly amount is less than the 10-year standard repayment for your loan balance), so the only difference is if your loans are eligible. You’re eligible for PAYE if you have no loans before October 1, 2007 and got at least one loan disbursement on or after October 1, 2011.

The oft-reported “downside” of income-driven repayment plans is that you will “pay more interest” over the longer term length. This is a bit of a red herring, as you are always free to send more money over to pay off your loan faster. IBR/PAYE plans allow you the flexibility to not need to make big payments; they don’t prevent you from taking prudent measures to pay down your debt. And if you’re planning on gunning for PSLF, then you won’t actually be making payments for that longer term length anyway!2It’s also not as though you could probably afford the standard repayment as a resident….

  • If you are recent graduate, you should select PAYE as your payment plan and call it a day.
  • If you have loans from October 2007 or older, you aren’t eligible for PAYE and need to stick with IBR.
  • If you have no interest in PSLF (cynicism, short residency, smallish loans, private practice bound, etc), then you should probably refinance as soon as possible. The main substantial benefit of keeping federal loans is the possibility of loan forgiveness. Outside of that, private refinancing will save you money, and two companies now allow you to refinance as a resident.

If you’ve been out of school for a few years, you can potentially switch from IBR to PAYE. You apply to switch in the same process you use to update your loan servicer of your annual income. You go to studentloans.gov, pull in last year’s taxes, update family size, etc. Changing plans is just another choice instead of pick just “recalculating” your payments.

However, to switch from IBR to PAYE, this annoying thing happens:

If you leave this plan, you will be placed on the Standard Repayment Plan. If you want to change to a different repayment plan, you must first make at least one payment under the Standard Repayment Plan, or one payment under a reduced payment forbearance (you may request a reduced-payment forbearance if you can’t afford the Standard Repayment Plan payment).

This was presumably done to stop people from immediately jumping ship from IBR to PAYE. In practice, the “reduced-payment” requirement is $5. So you don’t need to shell over a few thousand to cover a month’s standard repayment. However, by switching out of IBR for the month, all of your accrued interest capitalizes. If you’ve been out for a few years making the typical negative amortizing IBR payments during residency, you may have a sizable chunk of accumulated interest sitting around.

A simple example:

  • $200k loan @ 6.8% accrues $13.6k per year
  • Assuming a $400/month IBR payment, the annual unpaid interest is $8800
  • After 2 years of residency, that’s $17.6k accrued interest. After 3 years it’s $26.4k.
  • Switching from IBR to PAYE after two or three years results in a new loan balance of $217.6k and $226.4k respectively. From that point on, the annual interest then increases to $14.7k and $15.4k.

So in this example, your monthly payment is reduced from $400 in IBR to around $266 under PAYE, which is great from a cashflow perspective. But now your loans are growing faster than ever (both from the capitalized interest on top of the fact you are paying down less of it).

By cutting those payments down from 15% to 10%, you’ll be taking an even bigger hit in terms of your loan growth. Keep in mind however that the interest that accrued while you were in school capitalized when you graduated, so you don’t have a ton to worry about if you’re fresh out of school or relatively close.

Which means: the reason to switch from IBR to PAYE is really best only to double down for PSLF. In order to maximize the gains of public service loan forgiveness, you want to spend the least amount possible during your 120 qualifying payments. The spiraling balance is then irrelevant because it’s going to be forgiven.

Over the long term, you lose some of that low-payment benefit for two reasons:

First, your “reduced” payment doesn’t count toward the 120 you need for PSLF. So you’ll have to make another as an attending, which could be as high as the 10-year standard repayment amount. In the example above, that’d be somewhere around $2-3k.3As a resident with the salary described above, that washes away over a year of the difference, but the more you earn, then the more you’ll save (until you cap at the standard repayment). Alternatively, you could pay the full standard repayment when you switch, but that’s guaranteed to be the 10-year amount as opposed to an income-driven amount, which may be significantly lower depending on your future salary.

Second, you’ll also lose a bit if your attending salary becomes high enough that you’re maxing out at the 10-year standard repayment and thus are paying more to handle a portion of that extra capitalized interest. In the example above, the extra $1000 will cost you around $13 a month; far less than you saved making the switch.

On the flip side, because PAYE prevents further interest capitalization due to its 10% cap, if you do lose your partial financial hardship due to your high income, at that point an IBR will capitalize a greater amount of accrued interest and then start costing more as well.

Well that’s boring. Technical details aside, the conclusion goes something like this:

  • If you want to go for PSLF, do PAYE if you can, as soon as you can
  • While your loan grows faster if you have to switch from IBR due to capitalized interest, it’s doesn’t matter if you’re doing PSLF. Even with an extra payment at the end, you’ll still just pay less money and get more forgiven.
  • Switching from IBR to PAYE just to have lower payments will definitely result in your paying a lot more in interest over the course of your loan if it’s not forgiven and you stick it out for the complete term length (which you probably shouldn’t).
  • If you don’t want to try to get your loans forgiven, then you should just refinance them at a lower rate (like yesterday).

Book Review: The White Coat Investor

09.09.15 // Finance, Reviews

I just finished reading James Dahle’s The White Coat Investor: A Doctor’s Guide To Personal Finance And Investing for the second time. I recommend it as a great first finance book for medical students, residents, and even attendings. Physicians are notoriously terrible at personal finance, and as a profession we are routinely preyed on by those in the financial services industry. Given the massive and enlarging amount of debt students are incurring to get the modern MD, we owe to it ourselves to put some time into our finances and our understanding of money, debt, investment, risk, and retirement. WCI is a great place to start (and the website is a treasure as well).

The biggest take home message is unsurprising to anyone who has thought seriously about getting out of debt, accumulating wealth, or read Mr. Money Mustache and similar folks online: Dahle says, “live like a resident.” This very convincing argument is essentially that best thing you can do for your long term financial wellbeing is to continue living like a resident when your salary increases as an attending. Delay the gratification. Do not “grow” into your new income. The difference between what you earn and what you spend is what you save. What you save is what allows you to “buy” your retirement, a down payment on a house, and fun toys. WCI also has a nice treatment of retirement accounts, mutual fund investing, etc as well as some basic coverage of asset protection, business structure, and income taxes. For some of the more complex topics, the book helps you figure out if and how important these are to you right now and suggests further reading.4i.e. If you’re not saving enough to max out your 401(k) or 403(b) to start investing in a taxable account, then tax loss harvesting is thus irrelevant to your short term plans.

One limitation of the book is its particular perspective/bias. The author is a married male physician with a stay at home wife, and multiple areas of the book are slanted for physicians in the same shoes. Consequently he accounts less well for couples with dual incomes, dual student loans, etc. As an example, the chapter on residency finance in particular literally assumes the physician resident has non-working spouse in his argument for why a resident shouldn’t buy a house. While I agree that most residents probably shouldn’t buy a home (although we did), these broad generalizations are tied to very specific advice that may or may not be applicable to the general reader. Along the same lines, a few comments peppered throughout are essentially thinly veiled advice to keep your non-physician spouse’s spending in check.

The book’s treatment of student loans was insufficient when it came out and now somewhat out of date (e.g. private refinancing for residents isn’t mentioned, because it wasn’t available at the time; PAYE is not discussed, etc). Finance books are full of numbers and examples, but what the right choice is for you depends on your options and your numbers.

“Live like a resident” is important advice—a dollar saved is actually more than a dollar earned (due to taxes)—but the argument that you can only achieve the “good life” and spend money on things that bring you joy after your financial house is well in order isn’t going to work for everyone, either practically or emotionally. Keeping up with Joneses is always a losing battle, but the emphasis on conspicuous non-consumption and driving old cars as the pathway to financial independence is occasionally tiresome. Active reading is required; question your assumptions but take away what you want.

On a related note, for those looking for a completely free first finance booklet, try William Bernstein’s (another MD) “If You Can,” which is somewhat condescendingly written for “millennials” but nonetheless distills the essentials of saving, mutual fund investing, and distrusting people who want to fleece you.

Older
Newer